Author |
Message |
Topic: Last time broker was active? |
francoisvdm
Replies: 3 Views: 3582
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:52 pm Subject: Last time broker was active? |
Thank you all. Event log did the trick. Need to proof it was down for a long time to avoid compliance issue. |
Topic: Last time broker was active? |
francoisvdm
Replies: 3 Views: 3582
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 6:27 am Subject: Last time broker was active? |
Is there a way to tell when was the last time a broker / integration node was running? This is for audit purposes.
Thank you |
Topic: Message Broker Developer V8 |
francoisvdm
Replies: 1 Views: 2478
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 11:04 pm Subject: Message Broker Developer V8 |
Hi All
Any idea where I can still download Developer version 8?
Thanks |
Topic: Hypervisor fixes |
francoisvdm
Replies: 0 Views: 1875
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:57 am Subject: Hypervisor fixes |
Hi
Will the normal fixes work on the Hypervisor version? And is that the correct way to fix IIB for Hypervisor?
Thanks |
Topic: dspmqfls examples |
francoisvdm
Replies: 19 Views: 19106
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:31 pm Subject: dspmqfls examples |
Great...thanks |
Topic: dspmqfls examples |
francoisvdm
Replies: 19 Views: 19106
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:23 am Subject: dspmqfls examples |
Thanks Tibor. It is not Tandem specific, I just want to show some examples for dspmqfls that is not following the boring straight translation  |
Topic: dspmqfls examples |
francoisvdm
Replies: 19 Views: 19106
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:12 am Subject: dspmqfls examples |
Thanks Tibor! The kind of output I'm looking for. Do you mind if I use your output in a presentation? |
Topic: WatchQ is back |
francoisvdm
Replies: 5 Views: 6141
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:05 am Subject: WatchQ is back |
I understand .... and yes, it is still me.... Looks like a lot of open source stuff is going to github. A lot easier to update it there...but I also understand some of the risks. |
Topic: WatchQ is back |
francoisvdm
Replies: 5 Views: 6141
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:30 am Subject: WatchQ is back |
Hi Peter
No.... IBM asks too many questions to make something a Support Pack ... unless the pressure gets very high, then I guess I'll make some time..... sigh
Groete  |
Topic: WatchQ is back |
francoisvdm
Replies: 5 Views: 6141
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:47 am Subject: WatchQ is back |
For all the old timers, if you ever used watchq and it stopped working for V7 .... get it here : https://github.com/francoisvdm/WatchQ |
Topic: Channel Triggering |
francoisvdm
Replies: 18 Views: 16945
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:07 am Subject: Channel Triggering |
I've seen a similar situation years ago. The way I understand it is that there is a very small window of opportunity (a few milliseconds) when it is possible for the queue manager to miss a trigger. ... |
Topic: dspmqfls examples |
francoisvdm
Replies: 19 Views: 19106
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 10:37 pm Subject: dspmqfls examples |
Thanks for the replies, but I think you guys miss the question. I'm well aware of its usage etc. The funny thing to me is that it states the documentation that it will translate queue manager names ... |
Topic: dspmqfls examples |
francoisvdm
Replies: 19 Views: 19106
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 11:06 am Subject: dspmqfls examples |
The documentation states the following: Object names are not necessarily valid file system names. You might need to transform your object names. The method used is different from that for queue manage ... |
Topic: QoS numbering |
francoisvdm
Replies: 0 Views: 17344
|
Forum: IBM MQ Telemetry / Low Latency Messaging / Everyplace Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:40 pm Subject: QoS numbering |
Would it not have made more sense to number:
QoS=1 as "exactly once" instead of "at least once, and
QoS=2 as "at least once" instead of "exactly once"?
 |
Topic: Old version of saveqmgr V5.3 |
francoisvdm
Replies: 2 Views: 4136
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:51 am Subject: Old version of saveqmgr V5.3 |
Tx Jeff! Much appreciated, exactly what I would expect from an MQ app! |