| Author |
Message |
 Topic: SSL on z/OS Questions |
fordcam
Replies: 2
Views: 5056
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:44 am Subject: SSL on z/OS Questions |
| I got in contact with one of IBM's GSKit people, and was told:iKeycmd was never intended as a PKI substitute so you should manage serial numbers manually for the certs you sign. If you generate certif ... |
| Topic: SSL on z/OS Questions |
fordcam
Replies: 2
Views: 5056
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:45 pm Subject: SSL on z/OS Questions |
Apparently, what I was missing is that runmqckm and/or ikeyman are not supposed to be used as a certificate signer. Even though they document this feature.
I did a lot of digging and asking at IBM' ... |
| Topic: SSL on z/OS Questions |
fordcam
Replies: 2
Views: 5056
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:22 am Subject: SSL on z/OS Questions |
| We haven't used SSL w/MQSeries until recently. But I have begun using MQSeries V6's certificate authority capabilities. I created key DBs for all of our distributes qmgrs in dev, requested certs, sign ... |
| Topic: Semaphores on Client Machines |
fordcam
Replies: 6
Views: 4636
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:02 am Subject: Semaphores on Client Machines |
But that assumes that they document their settings. 
They're certainly documented on the server side. I wasn't aware until today the client had requirements!
Actually, the 6.0 Quick Beginn ... |
| Topic: Semaphores on Client Machines |
fordcam
Replies: 6
Views: 4636
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:37 am Subject: Semaphores on Client Machines |
| I hate having shared memory and/or semaphore problems. They are generally fatal, and tough to debug. Pretty much all I do is match IBM's settings, and then cross my fingers. But that assumes that they ... |
| Topic: Semaphores on Client Machines |
fordcam
Replies: 6
Views: 4636
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:58 am Subject: Semaphores on Client Machines |
Hi
Check the below links it will help you to figure out
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21230205
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IY50304
ht ... |
| Topic: Semaphores on Client Machines |
fordcam
Replies: 6
Views: 4636
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:21 am Subject: Semaphores on Client Machines |
| Our DMZ machines run Solaris, and use the MQ client. I've noticed that we've begun getting FDC files cut on the busiest DMZ machine. All of these FDCs are for probe XY077003, and contain the error &qu ... |
| Topic: Problems Migrating from 5.3.1 to 6.0.2 (Solaris) |
fordcam
Replies: 3
Views: 4210
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:00 pm Subject: Problems Migrating from 5.3.1 to 6.0.2 (Solaris) |
And neither do I see that you have to migrate before you apply maintenance. The document doesn't mention fixpacks at all.
What I'm trying to say is that the typical way to go to a new release is to ... |
| Topic: Problems Migrating from 5.3.1 to 6.0.2 (Solaris) |
fordcam
Replies: 3
Views: 4210
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:27 am Subject: Problems Migrating from 5.3.1 to 6.0.2 (Solaris) |
We're attempting to upgrade our Solaris machines (about 40 of them) to 6.0, fixpack 2 (the current one). But it's not working too well.
When we attempt to bring up the qmgrs after the install, we g ... |
| Topic: DEFPSIST on SCTQ |
fordcam
Replies: 8
Views: 5766
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:06 pm Subject: DEFPSIST on SCTQ |
What would the implications be in changing SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE's default persistence?
Since we went to clustering, I've run into some problems with a couple of apps that send replies. We ... |
| Topic: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
fordcam
Replies: 7
Views: 4354
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:30 pm Subject: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
I'm hoping to use ME01, the WMQ Initial Context, in order to use MQ as my JNDI repository.
Not a good idea.
Using the support pac, if I create a QCF or Q, it will create real MQ objects and I don't ... |
| Topic: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
fordcam
Replies: 7
Views: 4354
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:51 am Subject: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
Use the JNDI repository of the container that your JMS applications are going to run inside.
If they are *all* running as standalone applications, then put a file based repository on a networked dr ... |
| Topic: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
fordcam
Replies: 7
Views: 4354
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:03 am Subject: ME01 and "Non-Local" Queues |
Apologies in advance for my ignorance about JMS, as this is pretty new to me.
I'm hoping to use ME01, the WMQ Initial Context, in order to use MQ as my JNDI repository. I've installed it, along wit ... |
| Topic: MQOPEN Performance w/SAN |
fordcam
Replies: 10
Views: 6583
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:32 pm Subject: MQOPEN Performance w/SAN |
| I suspect that the browses are unnecessary, since DAP does the loading as part of MQOPEN. That's when I saw the performance hit. I may try doing away with the browse, or I may just let sleeping dogs l ... |
| Topic: MQOPEN Performance w/SAN |
fordcam
Replies: 10
Views: 6583
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:26 am Subject: Queue Loading is the Problem! |
I think I've gotten to the bottom of this at long last, so I thought I'd post what I found.
I ran a 10 minute MQ trace a few days ago. During the trace duration, one of our key apps did an MQPUT1 t ... |
