| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
 Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:56 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
Every time a message crosses from one queue manager to another, it is being PUT to another queue.
This means that it can undergo name resolution of the destination it is addressed to.
This mean ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:22 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
| I heard some cases, for some reasons if there are many client connections connecting to the QM which WMB is running on, most likely the WMB will go down. By introducing a Gateway QM, this problem can ... |
| Topic: Multi Instance Queue Manager on EMC Storage |
echoesian
Replies: 1
Views: 2754
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:08 am Subject: Multi Instance Queue Manager on EMC Storage |
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21433474
From the link above, it is stated that the EMC Celery family is not supported for MIQM because it uses the mandatory locking mechanism. I w ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:37 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
I'm not trying to be obtuse or unhelpful.
If you have proposed the gateway earlier, you should have had reasons to do so.
If you articulate those reasons, and the customer says those reasons d ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:13 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
| Anyone please help me, the client is asking what is the need of the Gateway QM. They want to know what is the pros and cons. I cannot pull back and saying Gateway is not needed anymore because I have ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:57 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
| From the security perspective, would it be more effective if using Gateway as the front line of defense at least considering that the backend Clustered QMs which might be running WMB as the mission cr ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:38 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
I just thought this might be one of the advantage using a Gateway:
If I were to use the V6 onwards method, let's say a MQ client application is putting a message to QM1, but if QM1 Listener is down ... |
| Topic: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
echoesian
Replies: 15
Views: 15478
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:21 am Subject: Gateway Queue Manager is it Necessary? |
Would like to seek for your expert opinions on this.
For MQ load balancing on two QMs - QM1 and QM2, all I need to do is to set the Default bind type to "Not fixed" and CLWL use queue to ... |
| Topic: WebSphere MQ Explorer : no 'Managed File Transfer' item |
echoesian
Replies: 11
Views: 18032
|
Forum: IBM MQ File Transfer Edition Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 3:20 am Subject: Missing Managed File Transfer |
| I've tried with every methods, I'm still unable to see the Managed File Transfer icons on the left... |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:27 pm Subject: This is the code in my .profile |
PATH=/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:$HOME/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin:.
export PATH
if [ -s "$MAIL" ] # This is at Shell startup. In normal
... |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:15 pm Subject: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
I have tried to export the TZ after calling the mqsiprofile but still no success  |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:59 am Subject: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
Yes, the date is correctly if I commented the . mqsiprofile
The TZ = Asia/Kuala_Lumpur |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:15 pm Subject: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
Did you also check the other files sourced within mqsiprofile?
Could it be that the user's profile is setting the TZ wrong?
Or is defaulted from the box or group default profiles? 
I ... |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:11 pm Subject: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
No I did put any TZ=xxxx in the mqsiprofile
That's not what I asked. I am sure you did not, so what if somebody else did? and with a typo on - instead of + ?? This why I asked you to check. :innocent ... |
| Topic: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
echoesian
Replies: 12
Views: 9071
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:58 pm Subject: mqsiprofile changed environment date |
| No I did put any TZ=xxxx in the mqsiprofile |
