| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Triggering problem... |
cgache
Replies: 19
Views: 15748
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2017 5:26 pm Subject: Triggering problem... |
The consuming application is tibco bw and connects via bindings (through a svr-conn) so no client conn channels being used.
Sorry to tell you, but if you are using a SVRCONN channel then there is a c ... |
| Topic: Triggering problem... |
cgache
Replies: 19
Views: 15748
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:18 pm Subject: Triggering problem... |
| In my case the message is large (bigger than the default 4mb). It is not the same scenario as this one where it is triggered. The application is trying to send a large message and isn't getting to the ... |
| Topic: Triggering problem... |
cgache
Replies: 19
Views: 15748
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:06 pm Subject: Triggering problem... |
| In my case the message is large (bigger than the default 4mb). It is not the same scenario as this one where it is triggered. The application is trying to send a large message and isn't getting to the ... |
| Topic: Triggering problem... |
cgache
Replies: 19
Views: 15748
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:24 pm Subject: Triggering problem... |
| this makes no sense, i understand it was incorrectly configured to read from the queue, but what caused the 2079 error? I'm having an issue myself with message ending up on DLQ with mqrc 2079 but its ... |
| Topic: Triggering problem... |
cgache
Replies: 19
Views: 15748
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 3:49 pm Subject: Triggering problem... |
| this makes no sense, i understand it was incorrectly configured to read from the queue, but what caused the 2079 error? I'm having an issue myself with message ending up on DLQ with mqrc 2079 but its ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 10:24 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
Well it is a bit interesting. If you had got the port or IP address wrong I would have expected the following TCP reason codeWSAECONNREFUSED 10061 - Connection refused.
No connection could be made be ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 10:08 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
Well it is a bit interesting. If you had got the port or IP address wrong I would have expected the following TCP reason codeWSAECONNREFUSED 10061 - Connection refused.
No connection could be made be ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 9:47 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
| Well, for some reason it seems your server machine can not establish a TCP connection to your REQUESTER machine. This can be caused by all sorts of things. Your bet is to look really closely at the er ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 9:14 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
| I your server channel is in RETRYING state but not connecting then you would expect there to be error messages written to AMQERR01.LOG explaining why the connection is not happening. Are you certain t ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 5:00 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSFKSJ_7.5.0/com.ibm.mq.explorer.doc/e_channels.htm
The server can also initiate the communication as long as the server knows the connection name of ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:35 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
A REQUESTER-SERVER channel type implies that the SERVER end will be STARTed by an inbound request from the REQUESTER end of the channel.
Think of a large batch of messages that accumulate at the RE ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 3:27 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
| I have a server-requester pair, both have con name fields populated. When the server channel is initiated by application it goes into retrying state saying remote host not available but the remote hos ... |
| Topic: sender vs server channel |
cgache
Replies: 22
Views: 32908
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 04, 2017 7:08 pm Subject: sender vs server channel |
Not sure if its the correct post but it's somewhat related and hoping someone can help me out.
I have a server-requester pair, both have con name fields populated. When the server channel is initia ... |
| Topic: disable OAM in MQ 8.0.0.2 |
cgache
Replies: 10
Views: 16408
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:41 pm Subject: disable OAM in MQ 8.0.0.2 |
| Despite the title of this thread, the subject of the thread since 4/6 has been CHLAUTH - I sidestepped violating any universal law and never disabled OAM. CHLAUTH is the issue - specifically the c ... |
| Topic: Setting up SSL Key repository |
cgache
Replies: 3
Views: 7400
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:37 pm Subject: Setting up SSL Key repository |
| the .rdb file gets created automatically with the .kdb file. any modifications to the .kdb file will also modify the .rdb file, so make sure you always have the matching pairs - otherwise your SSL set ... |
