| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Getting ProcessInstance object from queryWorkItem api |
callocam
Replies: 1
Views: 7467
|
 Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:46 am Subject: Getting ProcessInstance object from queryWorkItem api |
Hi folks,
Just going to cut to the chase...show u my source code. Is it not possible to obtain the processinstance object from a queryWorkItems() api call? The code in BOLD is where its blowing up.
... |
| Topic: Ineligibile users rec. work |
callocam
Replies: 7
Views: 16001
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:21 am Subject: Ineligibile users rec. work |
Hey John,
Yea man...things are alright. Just bought a pellet stove to heat the house for next winter. Figure it a good investiment these days. Guessing you may not need such things in your neck of th ... |
| Topic: Ineligibile users rec. work |
callocam
Replies: 7
Views: 16001
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:44 am Subject: Ineligibile users rec. work |
Sorry for the delay on your replies.
Our basic process has been to:
* export the entire FDL to identify the user
* DELETE PERSON FDL
* export FDL again to confirm the user is gone
* add the PE ... |
| Topic: <Solved> Checking versions on z/OS |
callocam
Replies: 2
Views: 8440
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:32 pm Subject: <Solved> Checking versions on z/OS |
| I know when you run a FDL export, it will tell you what version of workflow your running. |
| Topic: Ineligibile users rec. work |
callocam
Replies: 7
Views: 16001
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:47 am Subject: Ineligibile users rec. work |
Greetings folks,
Our business community has not been able to determine when this first happened, maybe a few months ago, but we have identified users are receiving work they are not qualified for.
... |
| Topic: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
callocam
Replies: 5
Views: 12621
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:48 am Subject: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
| What we have decided is to keep a winXP machine available to support buildtime until we get off of workflow. |
| Topic: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
callocam
Replies: 5
Views: 12621
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 6:12 pm Subject: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
Hey John,
Hope your doing well.  As I'm certain you and most folks are well aware, buildtime won't work.  We're in the early phases of contingency planning for this vista conversion. We' ... |
| Topic: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
callocam
Replies: 5
Views: 12621
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:53 am Subject: Buildtime v3.5 compatibility with MS Vista |
Greetings workflow folks,
My company has deemed our apps be certified under MS Vista before the end of 2008. My application uses MQWF v3.6 on various linux machines and I use Buildtime v3.5 to provid ... |
| Topic: workflow access passes blowing out production app |
callocam
Replies: 1
Views: 5129
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:51 pm Subject: workflow access passes blowing out production app |
This is from our message logs:
CONFIG ID: ECHS DATE/TIME: 2007-05-07 20:27:39.748 HOST: prod : swel1p PRIORITY: ERROR com.ibm.workflow.client.util.FmcApiException:
FMC38009E MQSeries Workflow ... |
| Topic: workflow access passes blowing out production app |
callocam
Replies: 1
Views: 5129
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:35 am Subject: workflow access passes blowing out production app |
Hi All,
I'm in the heat of battle right now with my production application. It seems that the access paths that are used by the dynamic sql generated by workflow when attempting to build a worklist i ... |
| Topic: MQWF java doc location? |
callocam
Replies: 0
Views: 4022
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:55 am Subject: MQWF java doc location? |
Hi folks,
I recently had lost my java doc for workflow I had on my HD. And my company doesn't seem to have it either. Can someone please provide a link so I can download it?
It used to be located ... |
| Topic: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
callocam
Replies: 3
Views: 7281
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:03 am Subject: Re: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
What you are suggesting, might be possible, however, it would certainly be non-trivial code to write. You would have to Re create every instance and "replay" it to the current point of ex ... |
| Topic: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
callocam
Replies: 3
Views: 7281
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:01 am Subject: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
Hi John,
Hope your doing well.
We're attempting a proof of concept to see if this is feasible. But my understanding of the nature of the project, we will need to convert the unopened workitems in ... |
| Topic: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
callocam
Replies: 3
Views: 7281
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:28 am Subject: FDL model conversion - best practices? |
Greetings,
My workflow application is making the following changes to the FDL model:
Removal of a PES
Removal of NOOP
Removal of appropriate data and control connectors
We are not changing the ... |
