| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Caching in WMB - Choices & Performance considerations. |
brokerguy
Replies: 5
Views: 5998
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:26 am Subject: Caching in WMB - Choices & Performance considerations. |
Any thoughts or inputs to the above scenario/questions.
Please let me know if some portion of the question requires clarification. |
| Topic: Caching in WMB - Choices & Performance considerations. |
brokerguy
Replies: 5
Views: 5998
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:04 pm Subject: Caching in WMB - Choices & Performance considerations. |
Hi All,
I am at WMB v8003 level and would like to know your thoughts on caching within WMB and its impact to the system performance. I would be highly obliged if you can read through the below tex ... |
| Topic: SOAPInput-service operation routing & additional instanc |
brokerguy
Replies: 9
Views: 5943
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:32 am Subject: Re: SOAPInput-service operation routing & additional ins |
Split the wsdl into operation specific wsdl:s. Create a dedicated SOAPInput node for each operation wsdl and make them use their own instance pools.
Route requests in DP accordingly.
How does this ... |
| Topic: SOAPInput-service operation routing & additional instanc |
brokerguy
Replies: 9
Views: 5943
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 6:59 am Subject: SOAPInput-service operation routing & additional instanc |
Hi,
I have a situation. All of our services are having multiple operations, each having their own SLA from TPS, response time perspective. Now, I have been using SOAPInput node with routeToLabel/L ... |
| Topic: MQIPT or DataPower TCP/IP proxy |
brokerguy
Replies: 2
Views: 4051
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:38 am Subject: MQIPT or DataPower TCP/IP proxy |
Hi,
I am weighing the options of using MQIPT vs. DataPower TCP/IP Proxy. The organization already has a DataPower appliance on the DMZ. So, was wondering if having MQIPT separately would serve any ... |
| Topic: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
brokerguy
Replies: 4
Views: 5179
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:09 am Subject: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
Thanks McueMart!
Found the radio button on RFHutil. LB works as designed! |
| Topic: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
brokerguy
Replies: 4
Views: 5179
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:53 am Subject: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
| where can I change the binding option in RFHUtil ? Same happens wth RFHUtilc |
| Topic: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
brokerguy
Replies: 4
Views: 5179
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:57 am Subject: MQ load balancing not working with RFHutil tests. |
Trying to test MQ Cluster work load balancing.
I have windows 7 & MQ 7.5. I have 3 QMs (ProxyQM, QM1, QM2), all in one cluster. The cluster queue Q1 resides on QM1 & QM2.
I have Rfhutil ... |
| Topic: Broker MQInput Processing vs SOAP over HTTP |
brokerguy
Replies: 1
Views: 1656
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:32 pm Subject: Broker MQInput Processing vs SOAP over HTTP |
with respect to the scenario depicted in the datapower forum:
http://www.mqseries.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=64005
do you agree that from broker standpoint, it would be better from performance (re ... |
| Topic: Datapower to WMB |
brokerguy
Replies: 0
Views: 5327
|
Forum: WebSphere DataPower Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 4:01 pm Subject: Datapower to WMB |
Hi,
In our org we have around 50 services (WSDLs), DP XI50 is to be used as a security gateway and WMB to perform the rest, that is, connecting to the backend etc.
In this scenario, we can conn ... |
| Topic: CICSRequestNode non-transactional |
brokerguy
Replies: 1
Views: 2279
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:14 pm Subject: CICSRequestNode non-transactional |
The infocenter says that the CICSRequestNode is 'non-transactional'. What does it really mean ? Can it not enable a flow to be in an XA transaction with a set of CICS transactions ?
As I understan ... |
| Topic: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
brokerguy
Replies: 10
Views: 6168
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:21 pm Subject: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
You keep using "atomic".
What meaning are you ascribing to that word in this context? What "atomic" properties are you expecting to achieve?
Let me state with examp ... |
| Topic: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
brokerguy
Replies: 10
Views: 6168
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:44 am Subject: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
Maybe I did not understand your question?
Let me elucidate my question
First, there is no WPS in the architecture
Now, if I have to implement a SOAP/HTTP composite service in WMB, I may hav ... |
| Topic: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
brokerguy
Replies: 10
Views: 6168
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:44 am Subject: SCAInput for Atomic service calls |
Hi,
In process server, we can make SCA invocations to call atomic services (as part of service composition).
Can we do this in Message broker as well ? I mean rather than making an HTTP roundtr ... |
| Topic: WMB v8 Event monitoiring use cases? |
brokerguy
Replies: 16
Views: 13010
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:30 am Subject: WMB v8 Event monitoiring use cases? |
Imho you cannot achieve that with mere Message Broker statistics.
The OP didn't mention that they were doing request/reply within multi-flow scenarios (which I agree Message Flow Statistics wont he ... |
