| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
atheek
Replies: 6
Views: 9951
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:18 pm Subject: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
| Thanks mvic. I understand this could be something like calling XAClose before doing a xaend or xacommit/ xarollback etc which could lead to XA sequencing error. I couldn;t see any other FDC's related ... |
| Topic: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
atheek
Replies: 6
Views: 9951
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:59 pm Subject: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
| The error is thrown for XAClose I think. Below is the FDC generated. I serached weblogic support site and couldn't find any known issues related to this for the version of weblogic we are using (9.2) ... |
| Topic: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
atheek
Replies: 6
Views: 9951
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:19 pm Subject: MQ JMS returns XAER_RMFAIL |
Hi All,
We are using a 3rd party resource adaptor deployed on weblogic app server which involves in global 2 pc transaction with Weblogic as Transaction Manager and MQ as a resource manager. Often ... |
| Topic: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
atheek
Replies: 7
Views: 7165
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:40 pm Subject: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
Although the pre MQ 7.0.1 clients only (not QMs) can probably be handled by a network load balancer.
Peter - Can you explain why there is a difference between qmgr-qmgr and client connection, ... |
| Topic: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
atheek
Replies: 7
Views: 7165
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:28 pm Subject: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
| Thanks for the replies. It looks like we have to stick with MSCS for MQ High availability. We have other queue managers/client at different 6.x.x.x levels and it won't be possible to move them all to ... |
| Topic: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
atheek
Replies: 7
Views: 7165
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:05 am Subject: High Availability MQ in Windows without MSCS |
Is there a way to have a highly available Queue Manager on a 2 node Windows environment without using MSCS?
Our current platform has 2 node windows cluster and queue manager high availability is ac ... |
| Topic: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
atheek
Replies: 20
Views: 20679
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:26 pm Subject: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
But that would require for the sender to group the messages by say producing all messages with the same order id in the same group and using default open fixed for the group if in a cluster.
Yes. ... |
| Topic: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
atheek
Replies: 20
Views: 20679
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:17 pm Subject: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
upon receiving message from queue 1 move to queue 2 and record following in the DB :
original msgid, correlid, characteristic; processed status, current msgid (q2)
have a process that reads the DB ... |
| Topic: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
atheek
Replies: 20
Views: 20679
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:01 pm Subject: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
Not necessarily. Your assumption (that you did not state) is that it takes the same amount of time to process each of the colors (G,B,R).
OK. I didn't state it, but unit of order concept is used g ... |
| Topic: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
atheek
Replies: 20
Views: 20679
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:55 am Subject: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
| Weblogic JMS has this Unit-of-Order feature [which does exactly what you are trying to achieve] which allows ordered processing within a group of messages.How BEA guys has implemented this is not know ... |
| Topic: question on connection issues in java |
atheek
Replies: 10
Views: 9630
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:37 pm Subject: question on connection issues in java |
| The best practise would be to close all the consumer, producer, session and connection objects explicitly in the finally block. |
| Topic: Can I attach a message listener to a temp queue's receiver? |
atheek
Replies: 13
Views: 18427
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:31 pm Subject: Can I attach a message listener to a temp queue's receiver? |
| As per MQJMS, if your session is set for asynchronous delivery, then all synchronous operations Note: Using asynchronous delivery with a message consumer marks the entire session as using asynchronous ... |
| Topic: question on connection issues in java |
atheek
Replies: 10
Views: 9630
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:32 am Subject: question on connection issues in java |
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=171&uid=swg1IZ53632
IZ53632: XASESSIONS CLOSED DURING XACONNECTION.CLOSE() DO NOT DISCONNECT UNDERLYING CONNECTIONS TO THE QUEUE MANAGER
... |
| Topic: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
atheek
Replies: 20
Views: 20679
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:52 am Subject: When to acknowledge when using mulitple threads? |
| Operate session in transacted mode as FJ has suggested and do session.commit() as the last step of onMessage() method. In this way, you are acknowledging only the message processed within the current ... |
| Topic: message selector on a mdb. |
atheek
Replies: 15
Views: 20292
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:39 am Subject: message selector on a mdb. |
| I think this is a very common scenario in messaging. The best possible solution is to have separate set of message channels (by channel I mean remote-local queue pairs) between the sytems for each mes ... |
