| Author |
Message |
 Topic: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 6
Views: 4310
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:13 pm Subject: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
| mqjeff, Thanks. This has answered my question. |
| Topic: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 6
Views: 4310
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:19 am Subject: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
Tibor,
Thank you for your response
The link you provided is for the AMS for distributed. I would expect that only distributed would be supported. What is interesting is, if you look in the left ... |
| Topic: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 6
Views: 4310
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:26 am Subject: AMS (Advanced Message Security) and Supported Platforms |
All,
I am having trouble identifying the platforms that AMS is supported on. We have an environment where we run Windows, Unix (AIX/Solaris)/Linux, zOS, iSeries, Tandem NSK and OpenVMS. We are at t ... |
| Topic: Extended Transactional Client - Require its use? |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 7
Views: 4936
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 1:01 pm Subject: Extended Transactional Client - Require its use? |
| Yes, a very good question. I work for a company that as a rule, does not allow client channels. We have allowed them on a limited basis for internal users, but have locked them down to only access a s ... |
| Topic: Extended Transactional Client - Require its use? |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 7
Views: 4936
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 8:10 am Subject: Extended Transactional Client - Require its use? |
| Is there any way through configuration of a SVRCONN channel to require that all connections are using the ET Client? If not through configuration is the information available through an exit? That is ... |
| Topic: Workflow 3.6.0.5 fmczutil no server option for category |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 3
Views: 7210
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:28 am Subject: Workflow 3.6.0.5 fmczutil no server option for category |
| I am being told by the systems group who installed the software that there is only one option. If you install the server package, is there really an option on whether or not you want to install the da ... |
| Topic: Workflow 3.6.0.5 fmczutil no server option for category |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 3
Views: 7210
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:44 pm Subject: Workflow 3.6.0.5 fmczutil no server option for category |
| I am trying to create a configuration on a Solaris 5.8 server running Workflow 3.6.0.5. I am running as root and verified that the same components are installed as other working sytems. When I run the ... |
| Topic: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 10
Views: 10977
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:47 am Subject: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
Jeff,
Thanks for the follow up response. I understand the issues with support which is why I am looking to this forum for assistance. The problem we are having is more related to 32/64 bit library ... |
| Topic: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 10
Views: 10977
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:28 am Subject: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
Jeff,
Thanks for the assistance. Good for you, you got post 10791. |
| Topic: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 10
Views: 10977
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:25 am Subject: BLOCKIP on aix 5.3 and MQ 6.0 |
Tibor,
What do you mean when you say:
You have to re-compile the 32-bit pre-built file.
Do you mean it has to be recompiled with the 64 bit MQSeries libraries? We are running into similar ... |
| Topic: Inquire QStatus using (ms0b) com.ibm.mq.pcf question |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 1
Views: 4474
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:29 pm Subject: Inquire QStatus using (ms0b) com.ibm.mq.pcf question |
I found the answer, figured I would share if anyone else runs into this.
The latest version of the com.ibm.mq.pcf.jar file available via the SupportPacs (today) does not support the Byte Parameters ... |
| Topic: Inquire QStatus using (ms0b) com.ibm.mq.pcf question |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 1
Views: 4474
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:10 am Subject: Inquire QStatus using (ms0b) com.ibm.mq.pcf question |
Has anyone been able to successfully inquire the queue status (Type Handle) with the Parameters MQIACF_ALL or as follows using support pac ms0b on MQSeries 6.0:
pcfRequest = new PCFMessage( CMQCFC. ... |
| Topic: The Parameter Type for URID and QMURID for QSTATUS using PCF |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 3
Views: 4837
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:47 am Subject: The Parameter Type for URID and QMURID for QSTATUS using PCF |
Perfect Thanks Jeff!
-WannaBe- |
| Topic: The Parameter Type for URID and QMURID for QSTATUS using PCF |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 3
Views: 4837
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:36 am Subject: The Parameter Type for URID and QMURID for QSTATUS using PCF |
Does anyone know the Parameter type for the URID and QMURID attributes for the queue status command in PCF?
For QMURID, I have tried MQCACF_Q_MGR_UOW_ID but am getting a 3015: MQRCCF_CFST_PARM_ID_E ... |
| Topic: MS03 V6.0.0 on OpenVMS |
WannaBeInAParker
Replies: 6
Views: 7831
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:51 am Subject: MS03 V6.0.0 on OpenVMS |
harwinderr,
That was it! Thanks for the help, I would have never found that. Did I miss some instructions or was it a bug in the release.
Thanks again! |
