| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Dynamically set IMS parameters using eSQL on Broker 7 |
Seb
Replies: 6
Views: 3951
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 10:26 pm Subject: Dynamically setting IMS Connection Parameters via ESQL |
Hi guys,
I left this team a long time ago and back then IBM labs implemented a change into WMB, I think it was still v6.x to allow switching the IMS connection parameters dynamically via ESQL Envir ... |
| Topic: No result from evaluateXPath |
Seb
Replies: 7
Views: 4160
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:59 pm Subject: No result from evaluateXPath |
Hi,
just want to say thanks!
rekarm01's solution worked with a couple of slight modifications due to our more complex IFW XML structures.
@bsiggers: That was the weird thing, the developer wa ... |
| Topic: No result from evaluateXPath |
Seb
Replies: 7
Views: 4160
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:25 am Subject: No result from evaluateXPath |
Hi,
I am opening this topic for one of our developers, who is struggling with the evaluateXPath function. However, using XMLSpy it seems to be valid v1.0 statement.
This is an exemplary message: ... |
| Topic: Approach to store the data as xml file&read It using Jav |
Seb
Replies: 8
Views: 8407
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:38 am Subject: Approach to store the data as xml file&read It using Jav |
Hi,
you can use an XSL stylesheet to read the XML file ...
http://www.w3schools.com/Xsl/func_document.asp
Cheers |
| Topic: XMLNSC - handling of namespace prefixes as part of qnames |
Seb
Replies: 1
Views: 1529
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:14 am Subject: XMLNSC - handling of namespace prefixes as part of qnames |
Hi,
I am struggling with the following behavior of copying elements that have a defined xsi:type and I was wondering if this works as designed.
If I have an element defined like this:
<ns1 ... |
| Topic: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Seb
Replies: 8
Views: 4605
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 2:47 pm Subject: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
A few more questions for you. I'm not trying to interrogate you - just trying to get a clear picture of the problem.
we would need to create an MSet for every new service/interface we provideWhy do ... |
| Topic: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Seb
Replies: 8
Views: 4605
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:15 pm Subject: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Hey guys,
thanks for your answers so far. Talking about a WMB based gateway, even if we call it part of an ESB or not, the purpose is to do security and validation checks at the front door.
Now ... |
| Topic: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Seb
Replies: 8
Views: 4605
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:34 am Subject: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
The gateway will be part of a banking solution, means loads of messages, large in size and quite complex as they are based on IFW schemas.
For most of the messages hitting the ESB, WDP is used for va ... |
| Topic: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Seb
Replies: 8
Views: 4605
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:58 pm Subject: Service Gateway -> Msg Validation Options |
Hi guys,
in terms of building a gateway that also validates incoming service requests, we have to do message validation.
Using broker facilities we would have to create and deploy a message set ... |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:35 am Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Hi
@fjb_saber: Yes that's what I did, I just generated the XSD from the message definition to see the results in between.
@kimbert: Is it worth to open a PMR for that?
Thanks guys! |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:12 am Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Hehe,
good point! I already tried that. 
I can create the type ... export ... looks exactly the same like in my XSD. Then, I reuse the type in a restriction ... everything fine. But when I add ... |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:18 pm Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Hi fjb_saber,
I might be wrong, but taking the attribute definition off the element's restriction should not be a valid option, because I (my customer's provider) want to restrict the definition of ... |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:00 am Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Hi Kimbert,
This is the error I get:
Type restriction error 'http://www.company.de/schemas#MyElement_._type' (content type incompatible with the content type of the baseType): attribute declarat ... |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:54 am Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Just for my interest ... if it comes to a discussion.
I made it even simpler and asking what is still wrong with the schema. I define a base complex type that could have virtually any attribute. Wi ... |
| Topic: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Seb
Replies: 23
Views: 10304
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:48 am Subject: XML Schema restrictions in the message model |
Hi guys,
as Kimbert adviced, I will try to get back to the authors. Not the easiest way, as it is another company (our service provider) and the communication takes up a number of instances.
It ... |
