Author |
Message |
Topic: Business Process Choreographer (BPC) vs Generated Human task |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 5 Views: 11043
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:27 pm Subject: Business Process Choreographer (BPC) vs Generated Human task |
If the user is not a potential owner, adminstrator etc, on a task they will not be able to see it in the BPC explorer or elsewhere. You should utilize the staff verbs in WID to control the end result ... |
Topic: Business Process Choreographer (BPC) vs Generated Human task |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 5 Views: 11043
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:47 am Subject: Business Process Choreographer (BPC) vs Generated Human task |
I have noticed it is somewhat error prone. (We are running 6.0.2.4). Somethimes after submitting a new process instance I get a JSP error and then find that 3 instances have been created instead of ... |
Topic: Business Rules in WPS 6.0.2.4 |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 0 Views: 5642
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:29 pm Subject: Business Rules in WPS 6.0.2.4 |
Anyone using business rules in 6.0.2.4. We have run into a security issue with these. Since the rules are implemented at the cell level and we have different business application in the clusters, ... |
Topic: Failing to login to WPS Admin Console |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 2 Views: 8836
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:20 am Subject: Failing to login to WPS Admin Console |
Since you mentioned your using WID 6.0.2 I am going to assume that this is a development server and not a prod server. With that said....
You can try stopping the server and then turning off global ... |
Topic: WPS Documentation for using Visual snippet |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 3 Views: 8673
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:39 pm Subject: WPS Documentation for using Visual snippet |
IBM would have you believe the same thing. But its just not true You need to have some base knowledge of Java to use the visual snippet edit. With that said it does make some things much eas ... |
Topic: Using WID 6.1 with WPS 6.0.2 |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 2 Views: 8556
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:51 am Subject: Using WID 6.1 with WPS 6.0.2 |
There are a lot of new features that have been enabled in 6.1 so my assumption would be that modules created in 6.1 would not be deployable to a 6.0 server. But if you want to try it out let us know ... |
Topic: Configuring portal to work with Process server? |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 1 Views: 6917
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:18 am Subject: Configuring portal to work with Process server? |
I haven't had time to try it out yet, but this looks promising.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0606_gu/0606_gu.html |
Topic: Using JNDI with the JDBC adapter on WPS doesn't work |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 2 Views: 9713
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:15 am Subject: Using JNDI with the JDBC adapter on WPS doesn't work |
We have a JDBC connection that works fine but when we specify a JNDI name I get the following error...
Using test connection from the Admin Console the connection works fine. This is using the DB ... |
Topic: Unable to create a server profile in WID |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 3 Views: 9336
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:23 am Subject: Unable to create a server profile in WID |
To fix the old server, go into the admin console for the bad server and uninstall the offending projects. You can do this from the Enterprise Applications link in the left nav. |
Topic: upgrade to 6.1 |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 0 Views: 5421
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 9:44 am Subject: upgrade to 6.1 |
Anyone out there ever upgraded from WPS 6.0.2 to 6.1 with in flight long running business process. I was wonerding how easy this was or was not to accomplish. Thanks in advance! |
Topic: [solved]query() using QUERY_PROPERTY.NAME for multiple prop |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 2 Views: 7904
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:34 am Subject: [solved]query() using QUERY_PROPERTY.NAME for multiple prop |
that works!
thanks! |
Topic: [solved]query() using QUERY_PROPERTY.NAME for multiple prop |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 2 Views: 7904
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:48 am Subject: [solved]query() using QUERY_PROPERTY.NAME for multiple prop |
Anyone every search on multiple properties...
The IBM example shows....
"QUERY_PROPERTY.VARIABLE_NAME = 'customerClaim' AND " + "QUERY_PROPERTY.NAME = 'customerID' AND " ... |
Topic: POTENTIAL_OWNER query question? |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 0 Views: 5578
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:59 am Subject: POTENTIAL_OWNER query question? |
I am trying to pull a work list for another user (admin type function), but the work items have not yet been claimed. I know for claimed workitems I can use....
" AND TASK.OWNER = '" ... |
Topic: Where did the business integration perspective go? |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 3 Views: 7435
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:17 am Subject: Where did the business integration perspective go? |
I finally fixed the problem by unistalling modeler, RSA, and WID, then reinstalling RSA and then reinstalling WID at the 6.0.2. I did not reinstall modeler or the 6.0.2.2 upgrade for WID and everyt ... |
Topic: Where did the business integration perspective go? |
ProcessCentric
Replies: 3 Views: 7435
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:42 pm Subject: Where did the business integration perspective go? |
After upgrading from WID 6.0.2.0 to 6.0.2.2 I completely lost the business integration perspective. I tried wid.exe - clean several times and no go. I also have RSA 6.0 and Modeler 6.0.2.0. Any ... |