| Author |
Message |
 Topic: larger message |
PGoodhart
Replies: 10
Views: 7890
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:24 am Subject: larger message |
| I've moved 512 MB messages for years (v5.3) with segmentation. |
| Topic: Hang on crtmqm |
PGoodhart
Replies: 4
Views: 6026
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:33 am Subject: Hang on crtmqm |
CSD 11 is the minimum:
Here is what I am basing my support statement off of:
SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 9.0 has been tested with WebSphere MQ Linux for zSeries V5.3 with Fix Pack 11(CSD11) ... |
| Topic: Hang on crtmqm |
PGoodhart
Replies: 4
Views: 6026
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:03 am Subject: Hang on crtmqm |
| Yes I know. I had that set. I actually just wanted someone who might be searching for a hang on crtmqm on 5.3 on linux 2.6 (which is supported), to know if you neglect(forget) to apply the right CSD ... |
| Topic: Hang on crtmqm |
PGoodhart
Replies: 4
Views: 6026
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:55 am Subject: Hang on crtmqm |
| This is just a note to all the people having this issue. Make sure you have applied the CSD's required for your OS. In 5.3 MQ on 2.6.x linux with no CSDs applied, the crtmqm command will hang with n ... |
| Topic: More information about a fix |
PGoodhart
Replies: 7
Views: 5376
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 11:01 am Subject: More information about a fix |
So all you could find was 70872 - An FDC with probe id ZF154006 occurred in component wasSecServiceInit from program amqzlaa0.
I think these unprefixed issues might be fixes made without user req ... |
| Topic: More information about a fix |
PGoodhart
Replies: 7
Views: 5376
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:10 am Subject: More information about a fix |
| Yes you should be patching WAS not MQ. Which version/fix pac of WAS are you running? |
| Topic: IBM has moved WebSphere Support (again) |
PGoodhart
Replies: 2
Views: 3505
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:50 am Subject: IBM has moved WebSphere Support (again) |
| If you are having a hard time finding MQ support on the IBM website, it's not just you, they moved it. You need to get to WebSphere support now, not just software support (the WebSphere "products" ar ... |
| Topic: Maximum Client connections |
PGoodhart
Replies: 3
Views: 4919
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:31 am Subject: Maximum Client connections |
| This doesn't happen to be on a WAS server or some other Java application server? I have found that you have to tune WAS to keep the number of connections within reason. Plus the developers do have ... |
| Topic: MQ client channel connectivity questions |
PGoodhart
Replies: 9
Views: 11396
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:28 am Subject: MQ client channel connectivity questions |
| "I personally do not feel comfortable with MQ client connections coming in from business partners. I much prefer knowing that they have at least one QM on their side because it implies a certain amoun ... |
| Topic: SSL keysize differs |
PGoodhart
Replies: 7
Views: 8302
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:15 am Subject: SSL keysize differs |
| I know this may seem a bit off point, but if you are using VPN tunneling, then why are you using MQ SSL? Most VPN tunneling solutions are already wrapped in a very good SSL based encryption. (You mi ... |
| Topic: SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE |
PGoodhart
Replies: 12
Views: 13393
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:39 am Subject: SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE |
Here is what I have done in this circumstance that has worked...
This is at your own risk, but if you are going to delete the queue manager anyway otherwise who cares.
1. Stop the queue manager.
2. ... |
| Topic: Discourse \ Why more than one QM per machine? |
PGoodhart
Replies: 64
Views: 47888
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:19 am Subject: Discourse \ Why more than one QM per machine? |
| I see your point, and that whole message was weird. I think it was license driven (cheap rather then good). Some people also end up with lots of queue managers/brokers because of consolidation of eq ... |
| Topic: Discussion of WebSphere® Enterprise Service Bus |
PGoodhart
Replies: 16
Views: 19645
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:25 am Subject: Discussion of WebSphere® Enterprise Service Bus |
| From what I've been able to find in the features and benefits section of the IBM website this is really a misnamed product. It should be something like WebSphere Services. It seems to be focused on ... |
| Topic: Discourse \ Why more than one QM per machine? |
PGoodhart
Replies: 64
Views: 47888
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:47 am Subject: Discourse \ Why more than one QM per machine? |
I do the same as Peter.
I don't want to confuse our webheads, so they get two queue managers to represent two machines.
They seem to find and use/exploit any minor difference and then when it doesn' ... |
| Topic: CSD08 AND CSD09 |
PGoodhart
Replies: 10
Views: 14645
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:51 am Subject: CSD08 AND CSD09 |
| Thanks guys for filling in the blanks. I wish IBM would put something up explaining what is going on other then just pulling the download with no explaination. |
