| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Mercator
Replies: 7
Views: 5252
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:20 am Subject: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
| Thanks very much. Thats some excellent information. |
| Topic: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Mercator
Replies: 7
Views: 5252
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:03 am Subject: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Well,
if you were to actually do
mqsichangeflowmonitoring <brokername> -g -j -c active
For every event message you processed broker would emit TWO more relating to the transactionSta ... |
| Topic: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Mercator
Replies: 7
Views: 5252
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:33 am Subject: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Thanks for the response.
1) In my flow that is receiving the publications, I have added an MQInput node.
This is set to receive a BLOB as I don't care about the format.
This is connected to a Co ... |
| Topic: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Mercator
Replies: 7
Views: 5252
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:27 am Subject: Common practices for subscribing to Monitoring Messages |
Pub/Sub is not my strong point so I apologize in advance. I haven't been able to find a good answer to my following question.
How do people handle subscriptions in an environment where the topic ... |
| Topic: Invoking WTX 8.2 maps from WMB |
Mercator
Replies: 5
Views: 6198
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:52 am Subject: Re: WTX node's ability to use Message Sets (*.mxsd) |
Hi Mercator,
I am working with WTX node with XML input, can you please explain how
WTX node has the ability to use Message Sets (*.mxsd) natively for an input card ? what settings need to be done. ... |
| Topic: Invoking WTX 8.2 maps from WMB |
Mercator
Replies: 5
Views: 6198
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:45 am Subject: Invoking WTX 8.2 maps from WMB |
Why build type trees off of XML schemas? Use the schemas natively for input / output cards.
If you have XML schemas and broker is passing the XML data in to WTX, don't use either *.mtt or *.xsd ... |
| Topic: Performance Tuning in WTX |
Mercator
Replies: 5
Views: 6778
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:35 am Subject: Performance Tuning in WTX |
| Classic uses older methods of validating XML which does NOT use an industry standard parser. It relies on older type trees which have XML tags built as initiators / terminators and other similar cons ... |
| Topic: WMB 6.1.0.4 and WSRR v7 |
Mercator
Replies: 1
Views: 1467
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:29 am Subject: WMB 6.1.0.4 and WSRR v7 |
Can anyone verify / confirm that the WSRR nodes in broker v6.1 will work with WSRR v7? I can't find anything in the docs or on the web that would indicate a yes or no answer.
My client is demo'ing ... |
| Topic: WTX with WPG |
Mercator
Replies: 12
Views: 7810
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:53 am Subject: WTX with WPG |
can you guide me to configure WTX V 8.3 with Clear Case??
A few things. First off, I have never set up WTX with ClearCase. I know in the past the answer to these source control questions was th ... |
| Topic: Debugger making me to frustrate |
Mercator
Replies: 20
Views: 9632
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:20 am Subject: Debugger making me to frustrate |
How many flow projects do you have linked with your debugger (edit source lookup)? I know that the more I have, the slower the debugger gets.
I discovered this by noticing that my debugger was scr ... |
| Topic: WTX with WPG |
Mercator
Replies: 12
Views: 7810
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:05 am Subject: WTX with WPG |
If you simply want to create a map to call from a WPG exit, you would use the SDK and the API engine (WTX for Application Programming).
Trading Manager is an application that is very similar to WPG ... |
| Topic: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
Mercator
Replies: 13
Views: 10500
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:10 am Subject: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
Have any body used LocalEnironment.WTX.MapName to invoke a WTX map dynamically from a Compute Node...
Can you please share ur experience with MapName.
MapName overrides the map name. MapServerLoc ... |
| Topic: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
Mercator
Replies: 13
Views: 10500
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:28 am Subject: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
But when I deploy and run the flow, it is invoking the default map which I have set in the WTX Node. And not executing the map which I have set through ESQL code.
Is there any reason for this bcz a ... |
| Topic: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
Mercator
Replies: 13
Views: 10500
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:58 am Subject: Re: Overriding WTX map Name in the LocalEnvironment of WMB |
The documentation says I have to override the following setting
LocalEnvironment.WTX.MapName
LocalEnvironment.WTX.MapServerLocation in the ESQL.
Thats all you have to do to override the map name. ... |
| Topic: How to handle multilple messages comming to common subflow |
Mercator
Replies: 18
Views: 8579
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:41 am Subject: How to handle multilple messages comming to common subflow |
Ouch
Many of the projects I have worked on over the years would most certainly fall foul of those 'rules'.
There are far to many reasons to state here why I find them impossible to agree with ... |
