| Author |
Message |
 Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:45 pm Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
I am not stating beliefs just requirements.
Thanks,
Griff |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:33 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
Where is the non-broker qmgr where you getting the messages from? What platform and software?
Same hardware software versions at nonbroker qmgr:
Software is WMQ and WMB 7.0.0.1 running on Solari ... |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:21 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| I have not looked into any other solutions; IA97 was recommended by area IBM technical representative. I have not addressed my performance concerns with this individual to see what else might be a po ... |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:09 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| Well let me clarify my last post - only change to flow. Queue manager and queue changed to be not on the WMB host hence the need for IA97. |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:03 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| Correct; that was the only change. |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:59 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| I am not familiar with JMSInput nodes - where do I put in the queue manager name for the queue manager I am trying to client connect to? The reason I am using IA97 is to have an input queue not on th ... |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:26 am Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| Sorry for the confusion. I replaced an MQInput node with a AnyQmgrInputNode (via IA97). This caused the degredation from 160 to 5 msgs/sec. I changed the batch size from 5 to 50000 but did not see ... |
| Topic: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
GRIFF
Replies: 20
Views: 10232
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:52 pm Subject: IA97 (AnyQmgrInputNode) Performance Issues |
| I have recently been working with IA97 and seen a significant performance hit with IA97 versus local MQInput via queue on the broker queue manager. I do expect some hit on performance because of the ... |
| Topic: max characters in name of configmgr? |
GRIFF
Replies: 2
Views: 2323
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:01 am Subject: max characters in name of configmgr? |
| Thank you! |
| Topic: max characters in name of configmgr? |
GRIFF
Replies: 2
Views: 2323
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:59 am Subject: max characters in name of configmgr? |
Does anyone know the maximum number of characters for the configuration manager name? I looked under mqsicreateconfigmgr command but did not see anything mentioned.
Thanks,
Griff |
| Topic: Max Queue depth |
GRIFF
Replies: 2
Views: 3406
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:50 am Subject: Max Queue depth |
| A limit of max queue depth has been passed down to me over the years of 640k on AIX. I recently had a requirement to send 990,000 msgs and I looked to see if we had upgraded to V6 of MQ to see if it ... |
| Topic: Execution Groups show a status of "Discovered" |
GRIFF
Replies: 1
Views: 1813
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:44 am Subject: Execution Groups show a status of "Discovered" |
| We have a WMB 6.1 message broker with 5 execution groups. One of the execution groups has a flow that was "hung" but all the flows exepts that one were working correctly for the entire brok ... |
| Topic: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
GRIFF
Replies: 5
Views: 5695
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:22 pm Subject: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
thank you...pulled the tag from the trace - don't know why I did not think about doing that - probably stress!
SET OutputRoot.MQMD.ReplyToQ = 'queue1'; |
| Topic: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
GRIFF
Replies: 5
Views: 5695
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:52 am Subject: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
yes that is my typo; I meant I thought it would be:
SET OutputRoot.MQMD.ReplyToQueueManager = 'QMGRA';
SET OutputRoot.MQMD.ReplyToQueue = 'Queue1';
But I cannot confirm this....any help? |
| Topic: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
GRIFF
Replies: 5
Views: 5695
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:36 am Subject: setting Reply-to-Queue in outputroot.mqmd |
Can someone send me the syntax for designating a reply-to queue and reply-to qmgr via esql in a message flow? I would think it would look something like this:
SET OutputRoot..MQMD.ReplyToQueueMana ... |
