| Author |
Message |
 Topic: WMB and MQSMPO |
Calvino
Replies: 2
Views: 1662
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:26 am Subject: WMB and MQSMPO |
| Thanks Jeff - haven't even got the software for WMB7 yet I don't think (so was cheekily hoping someone who did have it could tell me quickly) - we won't even be thinking about doing the WMB upgrade un ... |
| Topic: WMB and MQSMPO |
Calvino
Replies: 2
Views: 1662
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:38 am Subject: WMB and MQSMPO |
Hopefully an easy question for someone to answer:
"Does WMB7 support the setting of message property options? (or in fact will WMB6.1 support it?)"
I've read the infocenters both 6.1 a ... |
| Topic: SOAPrequest, using failure terminal instaed of fault termina |
Calvino
Replies: 3
Views: 4474
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:55 am Subject: SOAPrequest, using failure terminal instaed of fault termina |
Interesting - so only 5nn (Server) faults get propagated to the fault terminal? That's not what the documentation implies.
Wouldn't it make more sense for all faults to be propagated to the fault ... |
| Topic: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Calvino
Replies: 8
Views: 6826
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 4:27 am Subject: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Cheers Jeff
We are trying to contact him right now! From what I can see from the trace, it looks like the problem is possibly at the unserialising stage ....
We do have a RealTimeOptimizedFlow ... |
| Topic: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Calvino
Replies: 8
Views: 6826
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 4:13 am Subject: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Hi fjb
We've tried it using specific CCSID and encoding too but we still get the same issue.
Ignoring the actual parsing of the message for now, what I am confused about is why the code returns ... |
| Topic: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Calvino
Replies: 8
Views: 6826
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 2:45 am Subject: IA91 Cache Nodes, Broker Domain Caches and ASBITSTREAM |
Hi there I wondered if anyone had come across this problem before or has any ideas how to circumvent it?
We have a service which requires to store multiple messages from a back end, and then stitch ... |
| Topic: Implicit Signed decimal |
Calvino
Replies: 1
Views: 2726
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 4:26 am Subject: Implicit Signed decimal |
Might be missing something obvious here ... 
Should your sign orientation not just be 'trailing' rather than trailing separate?? ie 300000{ not 3000000+
Cheers |
| Topic: SET Attribute on MRM Message - I'm lost |
Calvino
Replies: 16
Views: 11994
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:51 am Subject: SET Attribute on MRM Message - I'm lost |
You need to specify the fact that its an attribute I think ... Try something like:
SET OutputRoot.MRM."sw8:RmtInf"(XML.Attribute)"Ccy" = 'EUR';
Cheers
Corrine |
| Topic: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Calvino
Replies: 18
Views: 15944
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:34 am Subject: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Thanks James - that confirms what we thought. We are going to raise a product enahcenment request wtih IBM to see if we can get it added!
I guess this could be marked 'RESOLVED' |
| Topic: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Calvino
Replies: 18
Views: 15944
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:13 am Subject: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Jeff, thanks.
STUART.REPLY is a local Q. A colleague has been posting on Axis boards in an effort to resolve this too, and it looks like Axis2 1.1.1 doesn't support this at all (Not sure what vers ... |
| Topic: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Calvino
Replies: 18
Views: 15944
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:11 am Subject: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Sory Jeff, I don't think I'm being as clear as I could be here.
Yes we can define the reply Q as a jndi resource. We can set JMSReplyTo to that queue name. We can (using native jms code) have the ... |
| Topic: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Calvino
Replies: 18
Views: 15944
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:12 am Subject: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
| That's the rub though - how can you specify a static replytoQ via the jms uri? We have come to the conclusion that you can't - it only seems to support temporary dynamic queues - and this is a showsto ... |
| Topic: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Calvino
Replies: 18
Views: 15944
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:59 am Subject: "SOAP over JMS" vs. wsdl:requestresponse |
Hi James
Did you ever get this working? We are currently looking at replacing our "in-house" jms-based API with a SOAP / wsdl based interface.
Currently our MQ messages come into our ... |
| Topic: Setting Priority in MQMD message |
Calvino
Replies: 3
Views: 7836
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:06 am Subject: Setting Priority in MQMD message |
Hi.
ESQL looks OK... Check your output node properties - Advanced / Message Context. If this is set to 'Pass All' (the default) then it won't update - try changing it to 'Set All' and see if that w ... |
| Topic: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
Calvino
Replies: 7
Views: 4998
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:17 am Subject: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
Thanks Guys
The code is COBOL but due to a combination of circumstances we have only just discovered this bug shortly before implementation and the mainframe folks don't want to change their code o ... |
