| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Bobbo
Replies: 7
Views: 6079
|
 Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:09 pm Subject: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
It is taking 45 minutes from the first work item being created in the first instance to the last work item being created in the final instance.
I'll see if I can send you the FDL (legal).
IBM ha ... |
| Topic: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Bobbo
Replies: 7
Views: 6079
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:37 am Subject: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Yes, we have looked at WP01. IBM should release an updated version of that support pac.
We are working with IBM on this issue, but they too are having trouble finding a qualified WF 3.4 on z/OS per ... |
| Topic: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Bobbo
Replies: 7
Views: 6079
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:09 am Subject: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Thanks for the reply.
All parts are running the z/OS.
Process model begins with 3 syncrhonous UPES activities, and then goes into a block that contains 1 additional synchronous UPES and 3 NOOPS ... |
| Topic: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
Bobbo
Replies: 7
Views: 6079
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:53 am Subject: Creating and Starting Large Numbers of Instances |
| We are creating and starting 7000 new instances a day. The problem is that it is taking about 45 minutes to load 1000 instances and we only have about a 2 hour window. The process model contains a num ... |
| Topic: Maximum Filter Length |
Bobbo
Replies: 3
Views: 2654
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:54 am Subject: Maximum Filter Length |
| What is the maximum length of the filter used in the queryWorkItems() method call? |
| Topic: Workflow Audit at the Activity level only |
Bobbo
Replies: 3
Views: 2241
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:39 am Subject: Workflow Audit at the Activity level only |
John:
Are you saying that you can turn OFF auditing at the process level and turn it on at the Activity level by hand-coding the FDL? Have you actually done that before?
Thanks,
Bob |
| Topic: ForceRestart |
Bobbo
Replies: 2
Views: 1828
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:48 am Subject: ForceRestart |
Does an Activity ForceRestart() cause the Staff Resolution Algorithm to re-run?
Thanks,
Bob |
| Topic: High Volumn Activites? |
Bobbo
Replies: 3
Views: 2463
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:01 pm Subject: High Volumn Activites? |
| We have adopted the concept of Virtual User. Each Actual User is authorized to view one or more Virtual Users. However, you take this approach, you then have the problem of displaying a number of "una ... |
| Topic: Transition Condition Options |
Bobbo
Replies: 4
Views: 2511
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:18 am Subject: Transition Condition Options |
Good suggesion - I'll be able to use that idea with something else with which I'm working.
However, I intentionally used Strings to indicate the problem (I probably should have listed the Statuses ... |
| Topic: Transition Condition Options |
Bobbo
Replies: 4
Views: 2511
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:53 pm Subject: Transition Condition Options |
| I have a scenario where the Transition Condition from Activity A to Activity B is quite LONG. In fact, if I write it out (e.g., Status="1", Status="2", ..., Status="60"), ... |
| Topic: NOOP Activity Cost |
Bobbo
Replies: 1
Views: 1482
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:51 am Subject: NOOP Activity Cost |
How much does a NOOP Activity cost in terms of system performance? What variables go into deciding the cost of a NOOP?
Is it more performant to create a more complex transition condition or more pe ... |
| Topic: Need a Suggestion |
Bobbo
Replies: 1
Views: 1853
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:52 am Subject: Need a Suggestion |
Here's my situation:
I have multiple users with multiple roles. Within a given role, a person can be a level 1, 2, or 3.
There does not appear to be a way to assign a Level to any place other t ... |
| Topic: Default Worklist |
Bobbo
Replies: 4
Views: 1994
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:28 pm Subject: Default Worklist |
Texan:
Please post your solution to this. I'd be very interested in seeing how you handled this as we too have this need.
It would be nice if we could, in addition to sending a queryWorkItems co ... |
| Topic: Filtering Using Input Container items |
Bobbo
Replies: 17
Views: 8112
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:02 am Subject: Filtering Using Input Container items |
That syntax worked via the webclient...thanks for the help.
Do you think this is a bug?
Also, after I created this filter via the webclient, I went into the thick client and the worklist filte ... |
| Topic: Filtering Using Input Container items |
Bobbo
Replies: 17
Views: 8112
|
Forum: Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 9:44 am Subject: Filtering Using Input Container items |
It says 3.4.0...
Any other suggestions? Does this actually work for you? Am I specifying the string in the correct place (textbox in Worklist Settings dialog)?
Thanks again...
Bob |
