| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Bnikpour
Replies: 6
Views: 6312
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:11 am Subject: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to update this thread on the root cause for the issue in case anyone in the future has it again.
Root Cause
The root cause was that the messages were being manuall ... |
| Topic: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Bnikpour
Replies: 6
Views: 6312
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:40 am Subject: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Message is retrieved with RFH2
Consuming application is running on WAS using JMS
Poison messages should be rerouted to a Error queue on the same queue manager, and the normal function of both t ... |
| Topic: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Bnikpour
Replies: 6
Views: 6312
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 9:56 am Subject: MQ queue unable to GET after messages delivered |
Issue:
We are running Websphere MQ Version 7.0.1.5. When messages are put to the Request queue, one of the messages prevents the consuming application from being able to consume it and any subseque ... |
| Topic: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
Bnikpour
Replies: 4
Views: 8698
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:19 am Subject: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
Thanks! exactly the kind of information I was looking for.  |
| Topic: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
Bnikpour
Replies: 4
Views: 8698
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:42 am Subject: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
| I just don't understand how its that much faster? Does going over the network really slow down message transfer to a point where you would NEVER use a client connection instead of a bindings connecti ... |
| Topic: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
Bnikpour
Replies: 4
Views: 8698
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 am Subject: Client Vs. Bindings Mode - Performance |
Hi guys,
I read in the infocenter that bindings mode offers better performance than client mode. The infocenter did not, however, go further into detailing what kind of performance increases can be ... |
| Topic: Why are you here |
Bnikpour
Replies: 25
Views: 12477
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:13 am Subject: Why are you here |
Hell of a second post lol
 |
| Topic: Websphere Application Server - Auto Reconnect Possible? |
Bnikpour
Replies: 2
Views: 2636
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:34 am Subject: Websphere Application Server - Auto Reconnect Possible? |
| Thanks! |
| Topic: Websphere Application Server - Auto Reconnect Possible? |
Bnikpour
Replies: 2
Views: 2636
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:03 am Subject: Websphere Application Server - Auto Reconnect Possible? |
Hello guys,
I have a question regarding auto reconnect that is supported in WMQ 7. I do know that WAS7 itself does NOT support auto-reconnect.
However, is there a way to configure WAS7 to use a ... |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:46 am Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
I meant "large" in the sense that it contains more queues and channels than the old configuration.
Numbers:
Hardware:
2- P770 2cpu 2GB RAM ( CPU pooling)
OS:
AIX v6
Disk space:
... |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:55 am Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Just wanted to see if anyone had any input on how administration might be impacted with such a large main queue manager.
Most of the concerns I got back where thankfully things I had thought of wh ... |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:00 pm Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
| I have already moved it and done all the work, I was asking in my original question if there were any known issues or pitfalls I should lookout for while administering the type of system I have creat ... |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:42 pm Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
| Lucky for me its all J2EE running under WAS then . Though I will admit I was not aware of that fact before. |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:23 pm Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
| Yes all are using 2 phase commit |
| Topic: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
Bnikpour
Replies: 26
Views: 16062
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:02 pm Subject: Best practices for administration:hub and spoke archtecture |
| I have already moved it and done all the work, I was asking in my original question if there were any known issues or pitfalls I should lookout for while administering the type of system I have creat ... |
