| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| licensing of High availability Integration nodes |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| alaychem |
 Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 7:05 am Post subject: licensing of High availability Integration nodes |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 66
|
Is there a difference between two "regular" severs running integration nodes, and two serves running in *"high availability" (active-standby) architecture, where it comes to licensing? I couldn't find anything on IBM website
https://www-03.ibm.com/software/sla/sladb.nsf/searchlis/?searchview&searchorder=4&searchmax=0&query=(Integration)
It feels wrong to pay for two servers while only one works.
* I mean that the servers work in application cluster, not operation system cluster, so one server is running, and the other is "waiting" for the first to drop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2019 7:10 am Post subject: Re: licensing of High availability Integration nodes |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| alaychem wrote: |
| Is there a difference between two "regular" severs running integration nodes, and two serves running in *"high availability" (active-standby) architecture, where it comes to licensing? |
Speak to your IBM account rep. Your licensing deal is your licensing deal and may have very little to do with anyone else's deal.
As a side topic, consider how you would prove to IBM one server was only a standby. I'm by no means suggesting you would be so devious as to save some cash by claiming a prod server was "only a standby", but there are some unscrupulous people in the world.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
