| Author |
Message
|
| mqjeff |
 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:28 am Post subject: MQSC Code Formatting - MSOS question |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
I think I am in a good place to add code formatting to MS0S.
That is, to take a long string of MQSC
| Code: |
| ALTER QLOCAL ACCTQ(...) BOQNAME(...) QDEPTHHI(...) SHARE QSVCIEF(...) DEFPRTY(...) ... |
And format it using "+" or "-" into shorter lines.
My first thought is to make the use of "+" or "-" as a preference, as well as the line width.
I could also, somehow, figure out how to perform a "one parameter per line", like
| Code: |
ALTER QLOCAL +
ACCTQ(...) +
BOQNAME(...) +
QDEPTHHI(...) + ... |
That will be a little trickier, but I can probably work it out.
Do you have opinions on these decisions?
Other suggestions/ideas/thoughs/requirements ?
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:47 am Post subject: Re: MQSC Code Formatting - MSOS question |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Do you have opinions on these decisions? |
I would say one parameter per line is more what my target audience would prefer.
| mqjeff wrote: |
| That will be a little trickier, but I can probably work it out. |
I have complete faith.
I will shed not one tear if it simply ends up as shorter lines, and will slap the first audience member that complains. Even if they're not complaining about this.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:53 am Post subject: Re: MQSC Code Formatting - MSOS question |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Do you have opinions on these decisions? |
I would say one parameter per line is more what my target audience would prefer. |
Great. Would that be okay as a preference, rather than an option picked at formatting time? That is, hold true for the entire workspace, rather than on a per file per formatting step basis?
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:54 am Post subject: Re: MQSC Code Formatting - MSOS question |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Do you have opinions on these decisions? |
I would say one parameter per line is more what my target audience would prefer. |
Great. Would that be okay as a preference, rather than an option picked at formatting time? That is, hold true for the entire workspace, rather than on a per file per formatting step basis? |
 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Excellent.
Everyone else - please speak up, even if you want to complain.
Vitor's slaps will just be words, and remember that words will never hurt you...
The more opinions or feedback I get, even if it's just "I agree with that guy", the more comfortable I'll feel about my decisions, and the better MS0S will work for you.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
Oh, I guess a preference for the indent width/character (tab/n spaces).
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9398
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
... and retain compatibility with MQ for z/OS 80-character record limitation thingie?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| ... and retain compatibility with MQ for z/OS 80-character record limitation thingie? |
Well, 80 characters would certainly be a valid format line-width.
And unless you turned on auto-formatting, then it would leave the documents alone. (I don't think the base MQExplorer will let you turn on auto-formatting, unless it's on by default).
Off the top of my head, I forget if the plain text zOS command queue allows you to use + and -. But zOS does support a PCF command queue these days. Another preference to use that instead of the plain text command queue...
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Off the top of my head, I forget if the plain text zOS command queue allows you to use + and - |
It does.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Off the top of my head, I forget if the plain text zOS command queue allows you to use + and - |
It does. |
Then setting the line length to 80 (including the + or minus) would work just fine.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Off the top of my head, I forget if the plain text zOS command queue allows you to use + and - |
It does. |
Then setting the line length to 80 (including the + or minus) would work just fine. |
You could pander to the  among us, and ensure the +/- is in column 73.....
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Off the top of my head, I forget if the plain text zOS command queue allows you to use + and - |
It does. |
Then setting the line length to 80 (including the + or minus) would work just fine. |
You could pander to the among us, and ensure the +/- is in column 73..... |
you could set the line width to 74...
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| ...you could set the line width to 74... |
Close to his age too 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
Vitor's slaps will just be words, and remember that words will never hurt you...
. |
Are you sure about that |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20696
Location: LI,NY
|
An output similar to the one from dmpmqcfg would be nice.
What I am thinking about here is being able to run a diff against a file produced by dmpmqcfg....
Doesn't matter if the commented out headers are a different...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
