| Author |
Message
|
| jim |
 Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:33 am Post subject: TuningParameters in qm.ini |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 26 Nov 2013
Posts: 94
|
Why we need to configure TuningParameters in qm.ini file..
TuningParameters:
AgentClassMap=(1,1,1)
AgentClassLimit1=(2,2,2)
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:39 am Post subject: Re: TuningParameters in qm.ini |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| jim wrote: |
| Why we need to configure TuningParameters in qm.ini file.. |
Why do you think you need to? Or might need to?
Why do you think you need to double post?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
Are you on WMQ Version 6 by any chance?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jim |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:46 am Post subject: Re: TuningParameters in qm.ini |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 26 Nov 2013
Posts: 94
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| jim wrote: |
| Why we need to configure TuningParameters in qm.ini file.. |
Why do you think you need to? Or might need to?
Why do you think you need to double post? |
As this is general discussion session and we don't have option to delete So posted double  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jim |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 26 Nov 2013
Posts: 94
|
| exerk wrote: |
| Are you on WMQ Version 6 by any chance? |
Nope...MQ v7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:53 am Post subject: Re: TuningParameters in qm.ini |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| jim wrote: |
| As this is general discussion session and we don't have option to delete So posted double |
So ask for it to be moved. Want it moved? Want to answer my question while you're at it?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
Hits HERE and HERE. Personally, I'd have Googled it first, absorbed the information, then if I didn't understand it, posted here - then you would have likely not incurred Vitor's wrath...
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9396
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
We tune to address performance issues, like missing SLAs. What issue(s) are you facing?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Both of which underscore the reason for my original question - why does the OP think he needs to change them?
| exerk wrote: |
| then you would have likely not incurred Vitor's wrath... |
Growl.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jim |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 26 Nov 2013
Posts: 94
|
| Vitor wrote: |
Both of which underscore the reason for my original question - why does the OP think he needs to change them?
| exerk wrote: |
| then you would have likely not incurred Vitor's wrath... |
Growl. |
To improve the performance but not sure..How it work |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jim |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 26 Nov 2013
Posts: 94
|
| exerk wrote: |
| Hits HERE and HERE. Personally, I'd have Googled it first, absorbed the information, then if I didn't understand it, posted here - then you would have likely not incurred Vitor's wrath... |
Thanks...But unable in MQ infocenter... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| jim wrote: |
| To improve the performance but not sure..How it work |
How do you know you need to improve the performance?
What performance measurements have you taken? Which numbers are you trying to improve? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| jim wrote: |
| Thanks...But unable in MQ infocenter... |
If by that you mean you can't find the detail in the Knowledge Centres, neither could I, which is why I Googled it...
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| jim wrote: |
| Thanks...But unable in MQ infocenter... |
So your site bans the use of Google and forces you to only use the InfoCenter?
So you want to change these to improve the performance - again I ask why? How have you arrived at these parameters as the cause (or the solution) of the performance problem you've not seen fit to mention?
Here's another question you can fail to answer properly: if these parameters are not documented in the InfoCenter (and they're not because you couldn't find a reference to them), why are you even considering changing these undocumented parameters without the blessing of a PMR?
Also, if this does happen to solve whatever problem you're having, remember to retest every time you apply maintenance. Because these are undocumented features, there's no guarantee they'll work the same way (or even exist) in future releases.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9396
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| jim wrote: |
| To improve the performance but not sure..How it work |
The purpose of tuning is to allocate limited resources to the important workloads. Those resources are: CPU, RAM, and I/O.
You must first understand your current resource utilization by capturing performance data.
What are you tuning? Performance of what? MQ overall? One particular application? A combination of applications? All of the apps in the server?
If only one of your applications seldom creates a few 100MB messages, will you tune the qmgr to maximize that apps performance? Or will you tune another app that frequently creates many small messages?
Again, what are your tuning objectives? How will you determine if your tuning efforts have worked?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
