ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:52 am    Post subject: SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

Dear All,

I just created a cluster in my environment, with both channels connecting, listener ok, but one of the queue managers is with:

SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR

What it could be ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:10 am    Post subject: Re: SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

telesguilherme wrote:
What it could be ?


A fault in your cluster where one of the queue manager names can't be resolved.

Your channels are not doing as well as you think they are.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717

Look at the second topic listed here:

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wmqv7/v7r5/topic/com.ibm.mq.tro.doc/q039150_.htm?resultof=%22%63%6c%75%73%74%65%72%22%20%22%70%72%6f%62%6c%65%6d%73%22%20%22%70%72%6f%62%6c%65%6d%22%20
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

Dear All,

Thanks for the reply.

Problem persists
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

telesguilherme wrote:
Problem persists


If you've not changed anything it would. These things are seldom fixed by the Cluster Fairy (a distant relative of the Tooth Fairy with deeper technical skills but a poor work ethic).

So after reviewing your set up and the link provided by my worthy associate what did you determine? What actions did you take? What changes have you made?

We don't know anything about your situation that you don't tell us
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

I´m really sorry.

Node one:
server: asbrokerprofap02
queue manager: fapes_mq

display clusqmgr(*)
1 : display clusqmgr(*)
AMQ8441: Display Cluster Queue Manager details.
CLUSQMGR(SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR.desfap01.fapes-sede.com.br(1414))
CHANNEL(emi.fapes_mq) CLUSTER(fapes)
AMQ8441: Display Cluster Queue Manager details.
CLUSQMGR(fapes_mq) CHANNEL(rece.fapes_mq)
CLUSTER(fapes)


Node two:
server: asbrokerdesfap01
queue manager: fapes_mq

display clusqmgr(*)
1 : display clusqmgr(*)
AMQ8441: Display Cluster Queue Manager details.
CLUSQMGR(SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR.profap02.fapes-sede.com.br(1414))
CHANNEL(rece.fapes_mq) CLUSTER(fapes)
AMQ8441: Display Cluster Queue Manager details.
CLUSQMGR(fapes_mq) CHANNEL(emi.fapes_mq)
CLUSTER(fapes)

1. Both has the same QM name
2. Both has the same queue´s names
3. Both listeners are running on port 1414
4. Channels are communicating, and without the local address, only cluster parameters and connection name to the hostname and port (1414)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

telesguilherme wrote:
1. Both has the same QM name


If you have 2 queue managers with the same name in the same cluster that's a really, really bad idea & I'd be interested to know how you decided it wasn't. Even if it's not the cause of this problem it'll be the cause of others.

I repeat my comments on your previous posts about thinking about what you need, what you're doing and not just setting stuff up & fiddling with it until it seems to work. You especially seem very confused about what a WMQ cluster is, how it works, what it's supposed to achieve and what it doesn't ever achieve (like HA).
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

Well Vitor, Im sorry again

I need to make a load balance backend.

I also have not found the issues with the queue manager with same name, but i know ibm dont recommend it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/1303_broadhurst/1303_broadhurst.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gbaddeley
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2494
Location: Melbourne, Australia

telesguilherme wrote:
Well Vitor, Im sorry again
I need to make a load balance backend.
I also have not found the issues with the queue manager with same name, but i know ibm dont recommend it

For proper load balancing using MQ clustering you need at least 3 queue managers, 2 on the back end (consumer apps), and 1 on the front end (producer app).
DO NOT use queue managers with the same name, especially in MQ clusters. Please delete your queue managers and start again.
HTH, Glenn (19 years experience with MQ, holder of all IBM MQ certifications)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

Dear All,

thanks for the repply, answers and help and also patience.

All working now. Rebuild with QM´s different names.

My last question is how to set up a gateway QM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rammer
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 02 May 2002
Posts: 359
Location: England

telesguilherme wrote:
Dear All,

thanks for the repply, answers and help and also patience.

All working now. Rebuild with QM´s different names.

My last question is how to set up a gateway QM


The MQ Info Centre has a god section on Gateway Queue Managers, with various helpful diagrams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717

gbaddeley wrote:
telesguilherme wrote:
Well Vitor, Im sorry again
I need to make a load balance backend.
I also have not found the issues with the queue manager with same name, but i know ibm dont recommend it

For proper load balancing using MQ clustering you need at least 3 queue managers, 2 on the back end (consumer apps), and 1 on the front end (producer app).


I guess you can load balance with just 2 queue managers as of MQ 7 if CLWLUSEQ is set to ANY.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

telesguilherme wrote:
My last question is how to set up a gateway QM


Why do you think you need one? In the "what's the requirement" sense?

Remember, we only know what you tell us.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
telesguilherme
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 56

Everyone,

Thank very very much, i will end this topic here, and continue in another one, because the main problem about this one, was fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » SYSTEM.TEMPQMGR
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.