| Author |
Message
|
| jonatan bataz astudillo |
 Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: is it posible having 2 request on the same flow? |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 08 Feb 2012
Posts: 3
|
I have a flow like that
mqinput -> compute -> compute ->mqoutput
Is it posible that a request "A" can be in the second node compute and a request B in the first node compute?I am using the Environment, and i think that the request B is erasing the value from request "A".
I dont have additional instances from this flow.
I have the transaction mode = NO on the mqinput |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5849
Location: UK
|
No. Not unless you have multiple input nodes or multiple instances.
Transaction mode controls syncpointing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| zpat wrote: |
No. Not unless you have multiple input nodes or multiple instances.
|
Not even if you have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Esa wrote: |
| zpat wrote: |
No. Not unless you have multiple input nodes or multiple instances.
|
Not even if you have. |
Uhm.
So I have two instances of a flow that's started by an MQInput node.
I have a queue. I put message A on the queue. It gets picked up by instance one.
Immedieatly, I put message B on the queue. It gets picked up by instance two.
Message A is now in the 2nd compute node in Instance 1. Message B is now in the first compute node in Instance 2.
That satisfies the criteria of the request made by the original poster.
In no case does this allow Instance 1 to affect the Environment of Instance 2, but that is not directly stated as part of the question of the original poster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| In no case does this allow Instance 1 to affect the Environment of Instance 2, but that is not directly stated as part of the question of the original poster. |
And there is the remote possibility that "Environment" means environment, which is an odd way of spelling "Shared".
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5849
Location: UK
|
| Yes, I meant not even really. But it depends if you are using shared variables or not. I wasn't trying to be too specific. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
