ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Intresting.. Work load balance issue

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Intresting.. Work load balance issue « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
v_nanduri
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:38 am    Post subject: Intresting.. Work load balance issue Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 26

Hi team,

I am facing an issue in cluster environment. There are 6 QMs among them 2 are Full Repos. When i am posting message manually from T1 QM are messages are going to T2,3,4,5 QMs. Till now it is fine, but when application is posting the messages messages are going to T2,3,4 only.. Not going to T5.

Any thoughts why it is occuring?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9396
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

What version of WMQ?

What research have you done here? On Google? There is quite a bit of discussion here on cluster workload management. The cluster workload management algorithm is well-documented.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:55 am    Post subject: Re: Intresting.. Work load balance issue Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

v_nanduri wrote:
Any thoughts why it is occuring?


The application has a bug in it?

Something else is skewing the workload?

What have you checked for?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
v_nanduri
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 26

MQ version is 6025. yes i did google said about CLWLUSEQ. but CLWLUSEQ is QMGR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

v_nanduri wrote:
MQ version is 6025.


Not a good version of WMQ, but unlikely to be directly related to your problem

v_nanduri wrote:
yes i did google said about CLWLUSEQ. but CLWLUSEQ is QMGR


It should have said a lot more than that 1 option. There are a lot of other parts & places that could be involved.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9396
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

Read the WMQ Queue Manager Clusters manual - for the specific version of WMQ that you are running.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Clustering » Intresting.. Work load balance issue
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.