Did some work using it for another company in Edinburgh.
It is a reasonable solution but you should consider whether it is absolutely necessary. You will need to consider the overall environment to determine the benefits, i.e. if you have loads of QM->QM comms and have to setup channels and transmission queues for those, then clustering will ease this as well as providing workload balancing.
The customer I did work for also performed some rigorous testing to ensure that the behaviour of clustering was as defined and expected. These tests completed successfully (after one or two PMRs ) and showed that the workload balancing was working and that messages were still passed through the infrastructure if queue managers or queues were disabled.
It would be worth validating the environment in this manner in order to ensure that you will get the benefits and behaviour you anticipate.
Don't forget to consider clustering at the hardware level as well, as the use of MQ with both software and hardware clustering does require some extra configuration considerations.
Hope this helps. If you want some more information, mail me.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum