ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » News/Updates » IIB Version 11? No, now it's IBM App Connect Enterprise

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 IIB Version 11? No, now it's IBM App Connect Enterprise « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:41 pm    Post subject: IIB Version 11? No, now it's IBM App Connect Enterprise Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717

https://developer.ibm.com/integration/docs/app-connect-enterprise/faq/

Quote:
IBM Integration Bus version 10 was first released in March 2015, and since then it has been constantly enhanced with new features delivered alongside maintenance as part of quarterly fix packs. The most recent fix pack was v10.0.0.11, released in November 2017. We will continue to ship fix packs for IIBv10, but there will not be an IIBv11 because the next major engineering release for the IBM Integration Bus technology is IBM App Connect Enterprise v11.

_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20695
Location: LI,NY

Vitor wrote:
Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent.

Not quite: there is some subtlety about the configurations and capabilities.
No configurable service, it's all policies etc...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vitor
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

fjb_saper wrote:
Vitor wrote:
Only the names have been changed to confuse the innocent.

Not quite: there is some subtlety about the configurations and capabilities.
No configurable service, it's all policies etc...


There are the usual changes & enhancements you'd expect v10 -> v11.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7717

Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zpat
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5849
Location: UK

They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands....
_________________
Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9392
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

zpat wrote:
They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands....

Hah! I'd heard (started) a rumor long ago that there was an effort to discontinue use of terms like "execution" and "termination" and "dead" due to their non-PC (politically correct) tone. This confirms it... or does it?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20695
Location: LI,NY

PeterPotkay wrote:
Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially.

Does that mean that integration services would be deployed in 12-factor type just like microservices??
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

fjb_saper wrote:
PeterPotkay wrote:
Brokers (or "nodes") are no longer available, at least initially.

Does that mean that integration services would be deployed in 12-factor type just like microservices??


If a "12 factor type" is a DOCKER container (or equivalent) then yes.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

zpat wrote:
They'll have to pry brokers and execution groups out of my cold dead hands....


They already have; nodes and servers now.

Don't worry - I'm sure they'll still run as subsystems on z/OS, and that's the only OS that really matters.......
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
souciance
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Disciple

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 169

Well, the most interesting question surely is how will IBM deal with their licensing model if they wish for more customers to adopt a micro-services architecture with IIB? With their current model I don't think customers can just scale up and scale down on IIB in production. So if I as a customer want to create 100 docker containers during peak hours and scale down to 10 during off hours this should really not affect my license. Most likely it should be on some sort of "pay-as-go" model or some subscription fee. Anyone knows more on this?

Last edited by souciance on Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:55 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

souciance wrote:
Anyone knows more on this?


Anyone who does will probably be barred from mentioning it here.

Though I do agree the licensing model is an issue in this new world, and such an obvious issue someone in IBM must have noticed it.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » News/Updates » IIB Version 11? No, now it's IBM App Connect Enterprise
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.