| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| WMBT800 - Can't use TLS1.2 to talk to SVN. |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| DSPS |
 Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:17 am Post subject: WMBT800 - Can't use TLS1.2 to talk to SVN. |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Posts: 44
Location: Southern England
|
I have a broker toolkit, patched to 8.0.0.9 with SubVersion and the Polarion connectors installed, but when ever I try to connect to our SVN repository, which, by edict, is secured with TLS1.2, I get an error: -
svn: E175002: RSA premaster secret error
Most of the hits I find for this relate to JSSE and the java.security file, so tried various things, including copying the JSSE implementation classes and java.security file from a different Eclipse instance on the same workstation that does connect to SVN, also using TLS 1.2 and also using Java 1.6 - same error.
A colleague has suggested that I should just accept that the version of Subversion that's compatible with Eclipse 3.6 (Broker 8 ) is so old it won't work and that we should just use Tortoise SVN outside of the workspace to perform commits and the like, but that sounds like defeat....
Any (polite) suggestions please?
https://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycleapp/PLCDetail.wss?from=spf&synkey=V592217D13433W83
Suggests that broker 8 dropped out of support back in April, so I won't be opening a PMR then....
_________________
Distributed Systems Professional Services
WebSphere and MQ Consulting and Training |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:36 am Post subject: Re: WMBT800 - Can't use TLS1.2 to talk to SVN. |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| DSPS wrote: |
| Any (polite) suggestions please? |
Point out the paradox of a site wound so tight they insist on TLS 1.2 for their source code but running out of support software that's missing all the security fixes and updates for something that's got access to business data?
That'll get you a more modern Toolkit with the TLS support you need.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| DSPS |
| Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Posts: 44
Location: Southern England
|
Although I appreciate the technical and logical merits of that suggestion, either inertia or momentum (not sure which actually) through multiple tiers would thwart that.
I was hoping to get this working this week, not after raising changes and chasing them up through the tiers through several companies to get live sites upgraded to match...you know, when old harry needs skates?
_________________
Distributed Systems Professional Services
WebSphere and MQ Consulting and Training |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| DSPS wrote: |
| I was hoping to get this working this week |
Then grab yourself a copy of Tortoise SVN, admit defeat and cross your fingers you don't need to raise a PMR for something more serious.
It's plausible that you could get the SVN plugin working by some means, and one of the many people smarter than me who frequent this forum may be along in a minute with a suggestion.
But the shortest, fastest route to market that's guaranteed to be working this week is to accept that the out of date software can't do the things modern software can.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
You might be able to install the IIB toolkit inside a newer level of Eclipse.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
