| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Reg: MQ cluster Via Service Integration Bus (WAS) Config |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| sthota1982 |
 Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 3:55 pm Post subject: Reg: MQ cluster Via Service Integration Bus (WAS) Config |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 10
|
Hi ,
I would like to do setup MQ Cluster (Active and passive) through websphere application server (Service Integration Bus)
Would like to know, will i create 2 bus member in websphere application server
Please let me know your suggestions soon
Thanks
kishore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:53 am Post subject: Re: Reg: MQ cluster Via Service Integration Bus (WAS) Config |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| sthota1982 wrote: |
| I would like to do setup MQ Cluster (Active and passive) through websphere application server (Service Integration Bus) |
Ok, be clear on your terms here. A WMQ Cluster is 2 active queue managers in a load balancing set up. A High Availability Cluster (of which Active / Passive is one type) is not the same thing and isn't provided by a WMQ cluster even though they're both called clusters.
Yes, it's confusing. Roll with the punches.
If you want to set up an Active / Passive HA cluster, you will need HA software that supports Active / Passive (an example is Veritas) and configure that according to the vendor's instructions.
Alternatively you can set up a single queue manager under WAS and configure that queue manager within WMQ to be multi-instance. Not active / passive in every sense, but doesn't require additional software
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| IanAlderson |
| Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 23 Apr 2014
Posts: 17
|
As well as confusing MQ Clustering with HA, you are also confusing SIB with MQ. SIB is the default messaging provider built into WAS and runs in the WAS runtime. You can I believe also fail that over between instances in a WAS cluster, but with a performance penalty.
MQ on the other hand is external to WAS, and any HA mechanism as described by Vitor would be external to a WAS cluster. Which is a good thing imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
