| Author |
Message |
 Topic: New iib node with QMGR, getting 2085 on SYSTEM.BROKER.WS.ACK |
slonkoski
Replies: 1
Views: 1935
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:20 am Subject: New iib node with QMGR, getting 2085 on SYSTEM.BROKER.WS.ACK |
| Hey there. I created a new v-10.0.0.10 iib node with an existing QMGR v8.0.0.6, getting a 2085 on SYSTEM.BROKER.WS.ACK (used internally for Web Services so makes sense I need it). On my old v8 broker ... |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:25 am Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
TOTALLY EMBARRASSED - Will go away and hide for a while and not bother the list
I TYPO'ed (over and over) my eyes (and even my grep command) were using the wrong group name, off by one letter.
S ... |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:17 am Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
Yes,our security team added the gid/uid to the Linux server
I ran REFRESH command
I ran SET AUTHREC command
command failed
Ran every syntax I could think of for REFRESH SEC command
Re-ran SET AUT ... |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:57 pm Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
| And I've set others that are longer than 9, so not an * char restriction. so far no love, stumped |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:56 pm Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
| 9 chars |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:25 pm Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
Sorry for the confusion, long day (week!) no, not resolved - I had already refreshed security before I ran the SET AUTHREC GROUP command
then I received the 'AMQ8871: Entity, principal or group not ... |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:03 pm Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
Yup, should have mentioned I already did that:
REFRESH SECURITY TYPE (AUTHSERV)
and
REFRESH SECURITY
and
REFRESH SECURITY (*)
then I posted here. Sorry |
| Topic: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
slonkoski
Replies: 12
Views: 8522
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:32 pm Subject: SET AUTHREC failing on new group added to Linux server |
| Security team added new groups/id's to my server, I can see them fine in /etc/group and /etc/passwd, but when I run a SET AUTHREC command against the new group I get AMQ8871: Entity, principal or grou ... |
| Topic: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 11800
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 3:30 am Subject: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
That's what I like - options! 2 solutions, I have MO71 and it makes this task very easy, thank you Peter and tczielke!
I'll go with MO71 for this task, quick and easy. I'll admit I hadn't played ... |
| Topic: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 11800
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:39 am Subject: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
| Thank you, that will work! These are very busy QMGR's with many amqrmppa's so multiplie large trace files to grep, but at least I now have a way to determine the channel being used! Again, thank you ... |
| Topic: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 11800
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:59 am Subject: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
| Good thought on the DIS CONN but no cigars, close! At this point unless someone knows an undocumented trick I'm out of luck. |
| Topic: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 11800
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:49 am Subject: Oops, no, not really a cluster issue per se |
| The RQ is on QM1 - it is pointed to a local queue on QM2/QM3 that is clustered, I don't want to touch those queues. I am deleting the current RQ and replacing it with an alias queue. This is one of t ... |
| Topic: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 11800
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:32 am Subject: Struggling to delete remote queue in use |
Hi, I have a v7.0.1.6 QMGR and I need to delete some RQ's that are in use by unknown applications. I tried 'DIS QS(QM1.RQ) but of course get 'Unknown object name.'
All of the RQ's on this QMGR use ... |
| Topic: Another database problem, "the WMB is slow" |
slonkoski
Replies: 16
Views: 9823
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:45 am Subject: Another database problem, "the WMB is slow" |
| Got my vote after just spending almost 7 hours listening to DBA and app team swear 100% it couldn't be the DB call - but it was! |
| Topic: SOAP nodes can use broker-wide HTTP listener - should they? |
slonkoski
Replies: 8
Views: 8248
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 3:51 am Subject: SOAP nodes can use broker-wide HTTP listener - should they? |
| Is it safe to assume no (obvious) performance gains or hits with either solution? eggs are eggs? My gut tells me listeners at the EG level may make more sense, but I do prefer simple solutions if th ... |
