| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:26 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
That would be my advice
Ok thanks. Will do. |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 2:22 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Is the qmgr part of a QSG? If so, you will need to specify QSG group name.
It is yes.
I think these definitions can both be qlocal or shared ?
Is there any chance it's related to my issue ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 2:19 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
It would seem that none of the Queue Pub/Sub Daemon definitions were missing or incorrect?
Yes, none missing or incorrect.
So I need a PMR ? |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:53 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Which objects and what type are they? Can you post the current definitions?
The definitions that was already there but differnt type are posted here.
They are defined as QALIAS now because of a ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:44 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Which objects and what type are they? Can you post the current definitions?
Here are the 4 objects that was missing before I ran the sample job.
The last one is a "replace".
DEFINE ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 4:43 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Have you opened a PMR with IBM?
Nope. I wanted to check here first. I am in the mindset, that the QMGR is missing a simple definition here. |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:32 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Go to google. Search for 'CSQT855E CSQXFCTL reason=00005800' .
This leads to a 6 year old fix for MQ version 7
How ever the local fix description, made me try some things.
LOCAL FIX:
====== ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:20 am Subject: Re: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
If you do have other information in your CHINIT JOBLOG, for example a SNAP DUMP or other error messages, please post them here.
Cheers,
Morag
I have this. I think it's related:
DATA ARE ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 3:17 am Subject: Re: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
I tried to google and only related hit suggest that "The storage class for the SYSTEM.DURABLE.SUBSCRIBER.QUEUE queue was NOT defined."
But it is.
Post display statements for the queue ... |
| Topic: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Ulrik
Replies: 18
Views: 16657
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 3:34 am Subject: Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800 |
Hi
z/os v2.2 , MQ v8 - both on RSU1711
At the end of startup of the QMGR this message is issued in the CHIN task:
CSQT855E QDSL CSQXFCTL Queued Pub/Sub Daemon failed, reason=00005800
I tr ... |
| Topic: Problems with user id using TLS and CNF |
Ulrik
Replies: 2
Views: 12278
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:44 am Subject: Problems with user id using TLS and CNF |
Sorry , it should say :
We use MQ version 8 on both Windows and z/os.
We are doomed then ? (untill upgrade) |
| Topic: Problems with user id using TLS and CNF |
Ulrik
Replies: 2
Views: 12278
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:20 am Subject: Problems with user id using TLS and CNF |
Hello
First a warning : I’m new to MQ 
We are trying to setup a channel with SSL/TLS , that we intend multiple user to use.
From a windows/.net server to the mainframe. (later also fro ... |
