| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Monitoring RDQM performance |
JosephGramig
Replies: 0
Views: 21
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:10 am Subject: Monitoring RDQM performance |
| Are there stats or something to calculate the performance of working being performed at the three nodes as the data (msgs) must be committed at all three (well, I guess at least two) nodes before it i ... |
| Topic: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 259
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 5:17 am Subject: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
@fjb_saper,
Thinking out loud, I would expect the retry logic to work the same as if there was only one target in the CONNAME. Not sure if both targets count once for a try or each target counts as ... |
| Topic: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 259
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2024 4:02 am Subject: Channel Retries with multiple conname entries |
| How does the channel retry work when the CONNAME(host1,host2) targets a QMgr that could be on more then one node (as in MI configs)? |
| Topic: MQ Messages compression in sdr / rcvr channel |
JosephGramig
Replies: 7
Views: 8335
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2021 6:32 am Subject: MQ Messages compression in sdr / rcvr channel |
| Seems this can be set in the qm.ini as seen at the bottom of [url=https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/after-upgrading-websphere-mq-aix-performance-decreases-when-sending-messages-between-different-hosts ... |
| Topic: Reset a Msg Expiry time in MQ 9.2.2.0 |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 3448
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:47 am Subject: Reset a Msg Expiry time in MQ 9.2.2.0 |
@Morag
Thx very much. There were many Google hits and some indicate this was introduced at 8.0.0.6 (so it has been around for a long time).
I see a comment in the [url=https://www.ibm.com/docs/e ... |
| Topic: Reset a Msg Expiry time in MQ 9.2.2.0 |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 3448
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:28 am Subject: Reset a Msg Expiry time in MQ 9.2.2.0 |
A friend said he read an article stating there was a new feature at MQ 9.2.2.0 where the Admin could change the expiry from -1 (never) to a value that does expire.
I suppose this can be done with t ... |
| Topic: MQ AMS on Client Only |
JosephGramig
Replies: 7
Views: 8258
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Thu May 27, 2021 7:19 am Subject: MQ AMS on Client Only |
Thanks markt,
Now I understand how that can work (and clearly does). I will do my homework on the AMS-Qmgr to non-AMS-Qmgr flow.
Often, there are old Qmgrs that cannot do AMS but need to play in ... |
| Topic: MQ AMS on Client Only |
JosephGramig
Replies: 7
Views: 8258
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Thu May 27, 2021 5:33 am Subject: MQ AMS on Client Only |
@MoragHughson OK, now that you mention and it makes sense that the AMS work is in the application space, I see that it does not matter if the Qmgr is using OAM or LDAP for AUTHRECs and such.
My nex ... |
| Topic: MQ AMS on Client Only |
JosephGramig
Replies: 7
Views: 8258
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Tue May 18, 2021 7:30 am Subject: MQ AMS on Client Only |
| @Morag Thanks. I'm going to just scp the same contents of my users .mqs directory that I built and tested for BINDINGs mode. I also tested with the client versions of those programs and was miss lead ... |
| Topic: MQ AMS on Client Only |
JosephGramig
Replies: 7
Views: 8258
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 1:03 pm Subject: MQ AMS on Client Only |
I have not had a chance to download just the MQ Client (not from the server media) and try AMS.
What I have expects the AMS files for the user at the MQ Client (errors in /var/mqm/errors files).
... |
| Topic: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
JosephGramig
Replies: 8
Views: 9651
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Wed May 05, 2021 5:25 am Subject: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
I'm wondering if the error message is really more like a warning message saying it is going to renegotiate the secret key?
I also wonder how many TLS records relate to how many bytes in the SSLRKEY ... |
| Topic: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
JosephGramig
Replies: 8
Views: 9651
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 6:04 am Subject: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
I would follow the IBM advice and avoid using GCM CipherSuites at TLS 1.2, if possible.
Hmmm, what IBM advice?
Where does IBM give that advice?
thx, Joseph |
| Topic: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
JosephGramig
Replies: 8
Views: 9651
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:46 am Subject: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 data limit reached |
The following error was received:
AMQ9288E: Secure data transfer limit for channel exceeded.
EXPLANATION:
CipherSpec 'TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384' has reached a data transfer limit of 42949 ... |
| Topic: .NET managed mode and CERTLABEL supported? |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 4066
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:16 am Subject: .NET managed mode and CERTLABEL supported? |
Managed .NET clients cannot change the SNI which is how MQ specifies a per-channel certlabel.
While this article is titled "[url=https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSFKSJ_9.1.0/com.i ... |
| Topic: .NET managed mode and CERTLABEL supported? |
JosephGramig
Replies: 3
Views: 4066
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:49 am Subject: .NET managed mode and CERTLABEL supported? |
"Is an alternate queue manager certificate, specified on a SVRCONN CERTLABEL, supported when the connecting client is .NET using Managed mode?"
I'm not a .NET person but asking for them. |
